On the basis of factors such as ideology, the degree of populism, political leadership and form of the government a complex comparative
analysis of the formation and development of the party system in Lithuania and Russia in the post-communist period was
carried out. Summing up, it should be noted that both Russian and Lithuanian party parliamentarism are being progressively consolidated.
At the same time they continue to suffer from many shortcomings owing to negative historical heritage, characterized by
authoritarian single-party system, cult of the leader, ideological populism and undeveloped civil society, and also because of the
prolonged transition period of young democracies. Speaking about the prospects of the development of the party systems of two
countries, it can be assumed that in the medium term the current situation should not change dramatically.
Igor Ivanov, Vadim Volovoj Comparative Analysis of the Party Systems Development in Russia and Lithuania // The Russian Academic Journal, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2014, pp. 0-0

? ????????? ?????? ????? ?????? ????? ??????? ??????????? ????? ??????????, ???????? ? ????????? ???????????? ???????????? ???????? ?????????????????? ??????? ?????????-?????????
I.H. Khubiyev ???????? ?????????????? ????????? ???????????? ???????? ?????????-???????? (1988 -2003 ??.) // The Russian Academic Journal, Vol. 19, Issue 1, 2012, pp. 0-0

? ????????? ?????? ?? ?????? ?????????????? ??????? ????????????? ????????? ? ???????????? ??????? ????? ?
????????????????? ?????? ???????? ????????? ???????????? ????????????? ????, ?????????? ??? ?????????????? ???? ?
???????????? ???????? ???????? ???????????.
A.B. Chablin ??????????-?????????????? ?????? ???????????? ????????????? ???? // The Russian Academic Journal, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 2011, pp. 0-0

On the basis of factors such as ideology, the degree of populism, political leadership and form of the government a complex comparative analysis of the formation and development of the party system in Lithuania and Russia in the post-communist period was carried out. Summing up, it should be noted that both Russian and Lithuanian party parliamentarism are being progressively consolidated. At the same time they continue to suffer from many shortcomings owing to negative historical heritage, characterized by authoritarian single-party system, cult of the leader, ideological populism and undeveloped civil society, and also because of the prolonged transition period of young democracies. Speaking about the prospects of the development of the party systems of two countries, it can be assumed that in the medium term the current situation should not change dramatically.

The process of world globalization and re-engineering results in a new outlook on the interaction between political and religious institutions. Ideological inconsistencies that arise in former USSR republics put added weight on the necessity for psycho-historical analysis of this phenomenon. A survey of national ideology for such terms as “spiritual integrity”, “avoiding separatist sentiments” sends us back to Russian religious philosophers. Until late their works were deemed as effective manuals for re-framing a person’s moral standards and ethical self-awareness. Ideology founded on promoted initially by religion values of liberty, equality and tradition sets up precedent for political ideology to use inherent to religion resort to the spiritual as a way of forming binding forces between different social groups. However, general tendencies of the Church/State interaction, as social institutions, have always been issues for numerous complex arguments. The time-frame as well as cultural and historical characteristics of the transition from religious paradigm into scientific theology differ in the Russian nation from the same process in the countries of Western Europe. Theology evolvement in Western-European countries demonstrates general tendencies for structuring Catholicism, first and foremost due to the uprise of independent Papal States (Church States) and, ideologically, due to rational scholasticism.Dominant traits of the interaction between political and church institutions in Russia at the turn of the 20 th century reflect psycho-historical peculiarities of a theology developing in a total submission to political power and an overall dependence upon it.
РОССИЙСКИЙ АКАДЕМИЧЕСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ Издательство: Научно-исследовательский институт "Институт политических и медиаметрических исследований" (Новочеркасск) ISSN: 2221-9544

The process of world globalization and re-engineering results in a new outlook on the interaction between political and religious institutions. Ideological inconsistencies that arise in former USSR republics put added weight on the necessity for psycho-historical analysis of this phenomenon. A survey of national ideology for such terms as “spiritual integrity”, “avoiding separatist sentiments” sends us back to Russian religious philosophers. Until late their works were deemed as effective manuals for re-framing a person’s moral standards and ethical self-awareness. Ideology founded on promoted initially by religion values of liberty, equality and tradition sets up precedent for political ideology to use inherent to religion resort to the spiritual as a way of forming binding forces between different social groups. However, general tendencies of the Church/State interaction, as social institutions, have always been issues for numerous complex arguments. The time-frame as well as cultural and historical characteristics of the transition from religious paradigm into scientific theology differ in the Russian nation from the same process in the countries of Western Europe. Theology evolvement in Western-European countries demonstrates general tendencies for structuring Catholicism, first and foremost due to the uprise of independent Papal States (Church States) and, ideologically, due to rational scholasticism.Dominant traits of the interaction between political and church institutions in Russia at the turn of the 20th century reflect psycho-historical peculiarities of a theology developing in a total submission to political power and an overall dependence upon it.

Выявлены особенности и социально-политические последствия начального этапа становления культа В. И. Ленина в комсомоле. The article considers the peculiarities and social and political consequences of the early stage of V. I. Lenin's cult in the Komsomol.
Известия высших учебных заведений. Поволжский регион. Гуманитарные науки. 2011. № 3. С. 19-25.