The given research is devoted to methodological aspects of studying the history of the Russian nationalism origin. Today there are many different theories describing nations and nationalism; however, not all of them are equally well in describing the specifics of the Russian nation, which is something that is not generalized but unites two different communities. Accordingly, forms of nationalism in these communities differ as well. Most researchers agree that it is possible to distinguish civilian nations and ethnonations. Specifically, the American and French nations are traditionally perceived as the reference civil nations while the Germans are deemed as ethnonation. The American and French nations are based on the state while the German base on culture commonality and common origin. At the same time both of them are designed elites (political, financial or symbolic) based on certain myths. The difference lies in exactly which myths and symbols are given a greater value. These statements are true for the Russian nation as well. As the study shows, two different Russian nationalisms began to take shape in the 21st century independently of each other. One of them being the state or imperial tried to unite all loyal subjects of the empire under the name of Russians. The other type of nationalism included only ethnic Russians. Both types of Russian nationalism seem reasonable to be explored in three forms being a cultural, political and everyday manifestation. All these three components were present in both types of nationalism although the degrees were different.
The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, Vol. LXXVI, 2019. P. 515-521.

Миграция в наше время чаще всего рассматривается как отрицательное явление. В основе такого рассуждения лежат мировоззренческие позиции, согласно которым существование национального государства рассматривается в качестве базового параметра для жизни людей. Однако усиливающаяся в мире миграция – процесс, который уже не-возможно отменить. Бороться с ней бессмысленно, и в сложившихся условиях следует стремиться к улучшению ее восприятия. Для этого необходим всемирный сознательный поворот в сторону понимания человека как существа, всю жизнь формирующегося социально, способного к сознательному выбору и действию. Today migration is frequently considered as a negative phenomenon. Such an approach proceeds from the worldview ideas which consider the existence of nation-state as a basic value for people. Meanwhile, the increasing migration in the world is already an irreversible process. It is useless to struggle with it but under the current situation one should strive for improving its perception. This needs a world conscientious turn to comprehension of a human as a creature who is formed in social terms during his or her whole lifetime and who is capable of deliberate action and choice.