Продолжающийся глобальный кризис не только выявил внутренние слабости современного мира как саморегулирующейся системы, но и необычайно усилил критику капитализма как общественной системы. Впервые после исчезновения мирового социализма и торжества капитализма возникли самые серьезные основания считать, что современный капитализм далек от совершенства и таит угрозы для общества. Автор развивает мысль о том, что необходима коренная перестройка самих оснований международных хозяйственно-финансовых отношений. В статье дается оценка существующих подходов к решению данной проблемы, а также предлагаются новые решения с учетом реалий российской действительности. The current global crisis has not only revealed the internal weaknesses of the modern world as a self-adjusting system but has also intensified the criticism of the capitalism as a social system. For the first time after the collapse of the world socialism and triumph of capitalism there are strong grounds to believe that the modern capitalism is not so perfect and poses a significant threat to the society. The author considers that the grounds of the international economic and financial relations need a fundamental reconstruction. The article examines the current approaches to solution of the problem and presents new ideas while considering the realities of Russia. Подробнее https://www.socionauki.ru/journal/articles/1157750/

The purpose of the study is to develop suggestions to improve the government structural policies in the economic sphere.
World experience shows that during the restructuring the role of government in regulating the economy is growing. Its high effectiveness
in practice has been proven by the approach, according to which structural changes in the country should start from primary industries.
Export revenues of those industries are specifically used for the modernization of industries following next in the technological chain, and
the expansion of high-tech production.
High and stable results were achieved in economic development of those countries, which pursued the policy of dosed liberalism. This
enabled them to not only maintain the current level of domestic production, but also improve its international competitiveness according
to the principles of dynamic (not static) comparative advantages.
The current technologies in Ukrainian government and public administration are not effective and seem to be inappropriate. Result of
comprehensive liberalization and loss of control over economy was the lack of a meaningful strategy during the transformation of the
national economy. Accordingly, at the level of individual enterprises in the region there is no strategic vision of the problems. Thus, during
the years of reform there emerged an objective conflict between strategic management (which is missing) and operational management.
This point of view makes it impossible to answer the question, which of the many options offered by structural reform has a historical
perspective, also this point of view contradicts to all experience about ways to get out of structural crisis.
Studying the experience of implementation of structural change in many countries has shown that despite the theoretical recognition of
monetarism as the primary and most effective means of resolving most of the economic problems, and despite the long and strong market
traditions in most developed countries, during the period of structural changes and the formulation of targeted structural changes, the
role of state becomes more significant, the government structural policy is actively used, the main objective of which is to accelerate the
transition from recession of production to growth and improve national competitiveness at the global level.
The main areas of mechanism of structural policy implementation in Ukraine should be: 1) optimization of sectoral and technological
structure of the economy 2) providing progressive structural changes by means of organization of investment breakthrough. Only in
terms of the investment boom by creating own innovative products and supporting demand for those products, there may be progressive
structural changes.
The efficient implementation of structural changes in the economy of Ukraine, which is a set of measures aimed at restoring the sphere of
material production and diversification of the real economy sector, is not possible without deliberate government regulation.
Methods: dialectical, Economics and Statistics, abstract and logical
Mykhailo Gedz Regulation of Structural Changes in the Economy of Ukraine // The Russian Academic Journal, Vol. 29, Issue 3, 2014, pp. 0-0

The purpose of the study is to develop suggestions to improve the government structural policies in the economic sphere.\r\nWorld experience shows that during the restructuring the role of government in regulating the economy is growing. Its high effectiveness\r\nin practice has been proven by the approach, according to which structural changes in the country should start from primary industries.\r\nExport revenues of those industries are specifically used for the modernization of industries following next in the technological chain, and\r\nthe expansion of high-tech production.\r\nHigh and stable results were achieved in economic development of those countries, which pursued the policy of dosed liberalism. This\r\nenabled them to not only maintain the current level of domestic production, but also improve its international competitiveness according\r\nto the principles of dynamic (not static) comparative advantages.\r\nThe current technologies in Ukrainian government and public administration are not effective and seem to be inappropriate. Result of\r\ncomprehensive liberalization and loss of control over economy was the lack of a meaningful strategy during the transformation of the\r\nnational economy. Accordingly, at the level of individual enterprises in the region there is no strategic vision of the problems. Thus, during\r\nthe years of reform there emerged an objective conflict between strategic management (which is missing) and operational management.\r\nThis point of view makes it impossible to answer the question, which of the many options offered by structural reform has a historical\r\nperspective, also this point of view contradicts to all experience about ways to get out of structural crisis.\r\nStudying the experience of implementation of structural change in many countries has shown that despite the theoretical recognition of\r\nmonetarism as the primary and most effective means of resolving most of the economic problems, and despite the long and strong market\r\ntraditions in most developed countries, during the period of structural changes and the formulation of targeted structural changes, the\r\nrole of state becomes more significant, the government structural policy is actively used, the main objective of which is to accelerate the\r\ntransition from recession of production to growth and improve national competitiveness at the global level.\r\nThe main areas of mechanism of structural policy implementation in Ukraine should be: 1) optimization of sectoral and technological\r\nstructure of the economy 2) providing progressive structural changes by means of organization of investment breakthrough. Only in\r\nterms of the investment boom by creating own innovative products and supporting demand for those products, there may be progressive\r\nstructural changes.\r\nThe efficient implementation of structural changes in the economy of Ukraine, which is a set of measures aimed at restoring the sphere of\r\nmaterial production and diversification of the real economy sector, is not possible without deliberate government regulation.\r\nMethods: dialectical, Economics and Statistics, abstract and logical