Мы приводим текст доклада, прочитанного автором в 2013 году в Университете Сантьяго де-Компостела (Испания). Впервые опубликовано в International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. INFAD Revista de Psicología, 2013, vol. 2, nо. 1, pp. 645–652. Публикация В. С. Трипольского. The text represents the author’s report in the University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain) on the current relations between historical psychology and historiography. The main attention is paid to the changing margins between the subject fields and disci-plinary competences. The information potential of researches in history, anthropology, sociology, political and cultural sciences is considered through the prism of historical psychology as the key base for the investigations of world civilization, history of science and culture. “Personal History” (biography) is used as a typical example.

The article examines the main trends in the study of peasant revolutionary movement in Russia on the basis of the research project “People and Power: History of Russia and Its Falsifications”. It focuses on the analysis of historians’ views on the causes of global malfunction of the government during periods of unrest and revolutions, especially during the Second Russian Smuta of 1917–1921. The author considers some theoretical problems in the study of social crises and peasant rebellion in Russia. It is concluded that the main challenges in applying an interdisciplinary approach to the study of these problems are caused by methodological problems.
Revin I. A. Krest'yanskaya Rossiya i Vtoraya russkaya smuta: nauchnyy proekt “Narod i vlast'” v otechestvennoy istoriografii revolyutsionnykh krizisov [Peasant Russia and Second Russian Smuta: Research Project “People and Power” in the National Historiography of Revolutionary Crises] // Novyy istoricheskiy Vestnik [New Historical Bulletin]. 2013. No. 2. P. 56–66 //http://users4496447.socionet.ru/files/Proekt1.pdf