Some computational tools for medicinal chemistry freely available on the
Internet were compared to examine whether the results of prediction obtained
with different methods coincided or not. It was shown that the correlation
coefficients varied from 0.65 to 0.90 for log P (seven methods), from 0....
Some computational tools for medicinal chemistry freely available on the
Internet were compared to examine whether the results of prediction obtained
with different methods coincided or not. It was shown that the correlation
coefficients varied from 0.65 to 0.90 for log P (seven methods), from 0.01 to 0.73
for aqueous solubility (four methods), and from 0.19 to 0.73 for drug-likeness
(three methods). While for log P estimates, reasonable average pairwise
correlation was found, for aqueous solubility and drug-likeness it was rather
poor. Therefore, using computational tools freely available via the Internet,
medicinal chemists should evaluate their accuracy versus experimental data for
particular series of compounds. In contrast to prediction of above mentioned
properties, which can be done with several Internet tools, wide profiling of
biological activity can be obtained only with PASS Inet (http://www.ibmc.
msk.ru/PASS). PASS Inet was tested by a dozen medicinal chemists for
compounds from different chemical series with various kinds of biological
activity, and in the majority of cases the results of prediction coincided with the
experiments. New anxiolytics, antiarrhythmics, antileishmanials, and other
biologically active agents have been identified on this basis. The advantages
and limitations of computer-aided predictions for medicinal chemistry via the
Internet are discussed.
SAR and QSAR in Environ. Res., 2008, 19 (1 & 2), 27-38.